In a letter of April 12, Jack Debaun incorrectly stated that “Monte Heil … question whether science really proves anything.” It was a false statement because I have no doubt that real science really proves things. question sexuality.

A cult-like fixation on theoretical science is found in the rest of Jack’s letter. Nothing is certain or absolute in his interpretation of “science”. And here we have to ask, is he absolutely sure of that?

The existence of Jack has been proven in previous letters. However, according to his beliefs, the time may come when “science” will show, along with “appropriate evidence”, that he never existed after all. I need to have my head examined. Living a life without certainty can easily lead to mental health problems.

In Jack’s junk version of science, there could come a time when the earth turns out to be flat after all. Such is the nature of Jack’s uncertain “science.” Nothing is certain, nothing is absolute.

Facts are characterized by certainty, but theories are characterized by uncertainty. Facts don’t change, but theory does. The scientific method has several steps, and theory is just one of them. Abandoning facts for theory is junk science.

Monteheil

Sagle