What ‘Anti-Wake’ Groups Are Misunderstanding About Diversity Demands in Science
Recently, a select group of scientists, academics and experts denounced a major scientific journal. Scientific American (Siam) When chemistryto “wake up” and join the “social justice” bandwagon.
These criticisms spread from blogs to the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal and Newsweek.
advertisement
Jerry Coyne, professor emeritus of biology at the University of Chicago, said:
Former Cambridge Research Fellow Noah Karl said:[I] covered NatureDescent into Awakened Activism … It Seems So Now chemistry going the same way. ”
Founded in 1845 and 1880 respectively, Siam is the oldest and top popular science journal, chemistry The official journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Not a radical left-handed gin. Yet both have been repeatedly described as “too awake” and “anti-scientific.”
What is it that makes this group of mostly (but not exclusively) white, senior, and cisgender academics and professionals complain? Siam When chemistry Did the editorial board do something so horrible? Simply put, they recognize that times are changing and that including previously excluded and marginalized voices, experiences and perspectives on the page is not only the right thing to do, but more It is also necessary for better and more vibrant science. 21st Century.
here are some examples Siam When chemistry Having an “anti-awakening” crowd foaming at the mouth:
August 18, 2022, chemistry Published an essay by an astrophysicist. In it, the author writes, “Physics is always evolving, and so is gender. We learn when we understand that things are more complex than they seem. When scientists understand the complexity of the universe, Our science only improves when we accept it.”
August 12, 2021, Siam He published an essay titled “Modern Mathematics Confronts Its White, Patriarchal Past”. This included: …it’s hard to ignore statistics about the math profession. “
February 3, 2022 Holden Thorp Editor-in-Chief chemistry The family of journals that wrote “Science Needs Affirmative Action” began writing: Including scientists. “
May 24, 2022, Siam Released an opinion piece titled “Science Must Not Be Used to Promote White Supremacy,” stating that “Scientists must play an active role in combating both violence and white supremacy.” …scientists too often fail to protect their colleagues and intellectual ancestors like James,” who pointed out that white supremacist advocates like Watson and E.O. should be ignored because “
These journals open the page to seriously discuss issues of discrimination and prejudice in science that most senior cis-male white scholars don’t necessarily face. This is a key element of change.
The final example I provide is my own. May 21, 2021, chemistry Published an invited editorial on “The Descent of Mankind 150 Years Later”.
In it I wrote: They should also teach Darwin as an Englishman with harmful and unfounded biases that distorted his views on data and experience. Racist, sexist, white supremacist, how many Whether scholars use concepts or statements that are “tested” by appearing in “Descent” as supporting false beliefs, and the general public accepts many of them uncritically…the scientific community Recognize and act on the need for diverse voices that can reject their legacy, and eliminate prejudice and harm in evolutionary science by making inclusive practices central to evolutionary inquiry. “
The article inspired a huge outburst of anger from the “Anti-Wake” crowd, including a group of senior biologists, and even called for his dismissal from Princeton. Obviously I wasn’t. But why is this a problem?
Because science has problems. The history of systemic gender inequality, sexism, racism, disabilityism, colonialism and its neocolonial present is present in science.
Numerous recent peer-reviewed articles, essays, and books demonstrate these real truths (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here etc.).
This issue is so pressing to the practice of science that the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine are currently conducting consensus studies on the topic. , has (and still does) a role in maintaining the structure of systemic biases and the harm they produce. My editorial take (and why) chemistry Systems of racism and sexism are powerful and can blind even a brilliant scientist like Darwin.
We teach Darwin as a great scientist (and we should). But while reading “Descent of Man,” I come across claims that students who are not white and who do not identify as male are less human, cognitively impaired, and “less than.” These are claims made by scholars who we recognize as geniuses in understanding the evolutionary process and the originators of many, and unless refuted or modified, some To the reader, it can be a signal that they don’t belong: unequal or worthless. This is true even if many readers (such as older white cis men) don’t realize it.
Scientists and journals must publicly and unequivocally deny racist and sexist allegations and demonstrate that they are scientifically incorrect while pursuing constructive methods (see this journal example). nature human behavior soon). This is not a radical “awakened” unscientific claim, but a valid, intellectually robust, and necessary claim.editorial board of Siam, chemistryand many other scientific journals have recognized this reality and are doing something about it.
We, the citizens of Princeton, make up the heart of one of the most prominent and prominent centers of knowledge creation on the planet. Princeton is the epicenter of scientific excellence and influence in shaping how science (the large-scale document) is practiced, perceived and deployed globally. Are we leaning into the necessities of the 21st century with conviction and action? Or are we sidetracked by attention to the “anti-awakening” hysteria and hesitant to move on? All Princeton citizens But I hope you will be spurred to ask and think carefully about these questions and the answers to them.
For me, this is the beginning of my third year on campus, so I’m still learning the tricks and realities of this institution. I am very hopeful and inspired by what I see in the increasing diversity of students (of all kinds) and the energy and potential that it unleashes. We have a long way to go to inclusivity, but we are deeply appreciative of the quality and substance of the ongoing debate and action on campus. I look forward to leaning, thinking, discussing and acting.
Agustín Fuentes is a professor of anthropology at Princeton University, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This is his first column as a faculty columnist for “Prince.”‘ he can be reached at afuentes2@princeton.edu.
